SottoSotto
Back to blog
whispergooglecomparisonspeech-to-textAI

Whisper vs Google Speech-to-Text: Which is Better?

Detailed comparison of OpenAI Whisper and Google Speech-to-Text. Compare accuracy, privacy, cost, and speed to choose the right transcription solution.

K
December 3, 20257 min read

Two giants in speech recognition: OpenAI's open-source Whisper and Google's cloud-based Speech-to-Text API. Here's how they compare for real-world use.

Architecture Differences

Whisper is a transformer model you can run locally. Google Speech-to-Text is a cloud API that processes audio on Google's servers. This fundamental difference affects everything else.

Accuracy Comparison

Both achieve excellent accuracy, but with different strengths:

  • Whisper: Better with accents, multiple languages, noisy audio
  • Google: Excellent real-time streaming, better punctuation

Privacy

Whisper runs 100% locally—your audio never leaves your device. Google processes everything in their cloud, meaning your conversations pass through their servers.

Cost Over Time

UsageGoogle (per month)Whisper Local
Light (1hr/day)~$15$0
Heavy (4hr/day)~$60$0

The Verdict

For dictation and personal use, Whisper wins on privacy and cost. For enterprise apps needing streaming transcription with SLAs, Google might make sense.

Best of Both Worlds

Sotto runs Whisper locally by default with optional cloud fallback. $29 one-time purchase.

Get Sotto
K

About Kitze

Creator of Sotto and indie developer building tools for productivity. Passionate about local AI and privacy-first software.

Follow on Twitter